Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:53
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump threatens ‘very serious consequences’ if Musk backs Democrats - The Washington Post
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Do you think the number of sissies is on the rise?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Let’s just make it real clear:
You sound like ChatGPT - The Verge
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Australia's Qantas to close budget airline Jetstar Asia - BBC
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Feature: 11 Games With 'Secret' Performance Bumps You Should Revisit On Switch 2 - Nintendo Life
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
‘Marathon’ NDA Alpha Leaks Show Visual Improvements, Detail New Additions - Forbes